data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c8a5/1c8a526d1ecbfbfff08c789485a6b92343555e5a" alt=""
I mentioned how it had extra-wide gangways, to create a single internal space not divided into the traditional carriages, but the photo I had wasn't very good. Here's a better one I've just stumbled across:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52190/52190006747f7c3288337fdfd25060c6e7f6ad31" alt=""
I'm in two minds about this approach: apparently most of us passengers prefer it, being able to see the whole length of the train, to find empty seats more easily and to move away from unpleasant people. I think it makes the space feel a bit clinical and soulless.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66072/660724056ec3bfcde6da541561bc42a80137c746" alt=""
That last shot shows the new stock alongside the old "A" stock it's replacing.
2 comments:
I wonder why they've opted for plug doors? Surely this sort of stock doesn't achieve speeds which call for such problem-prone complexity? Have just returned from DC where the metro trains use simple 750v third-rail side-collection technology and sliding doors and are comfortable enough even though the stations are rather soulless and dark. They still have drivers but there was no sign of any signals: doubtless they're old hat these days...
The stock has sliding doors, not plug.
Post a Comment