data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11673/11673f3a4c9d5df77ee8121b6e9eff8713d08338" alt=""
There are two things that particularly interest me about this (the Boeing 787 "Dreamliner", in case you were wondering): first, that its nose looks remarkably like that of a De Havilland Comet, the world's first civil jet airliner.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9203/c920355aef45efe273e584d80020880ea0417c72" alt=""
Which is, of course, a huge plus point as far as I'm concerned.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bf4d/6bf4d20ab7b7b1136704223d2627659fdcb4cae3" alt=""
And secondly a statistic that Boeing released at the same time as their baby's arrival: that they expect the total number of passenger jets to be flying in ten or so years to be approximately double the number flying today.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f42b/2f42b6908b99ed47dc8ddb0836994c3c7026eabf" alt=""
I'm glad to see my campaign to reduce my own carbon footprint by flying much less often has had such a profound impact on the market.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84e6f/84e6f5181e46d2ee5061c000f4060d00638a1a32" alt=""
Well, if no-one else is going to bother...
1 comment:
I agree with you on the part about the nose. The Comet was a very nice airliner. And about the statistics, well all I can say is, "it's no good news", because it shows that we are still carrying straight ahead without paying much attention to the consequences of our behaviors. I still believe that flying is a fantastic thing, but doing it in the "low-cost tin box" way is completely crazy and irresponsible.
Post a Comment