I'm torn. Part of me likes the aesthetic effect of this image.
But another part of me finds it utterly unerotic. So I guess as porn it fails.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Small winkies and trains. A bit of architecture. And films. Lots of films. What's not to like?
5 comments:
Looks like something out of the new Kylie single video. Although there is actually quite a bit of cock visible if you look closely.
I like it, as a peice of art.
... as porn it fails.
Naturally. That is not its purpose, any more than (to take a random example) the Laocoon.
No less pleasing for that.
Laocoon not porn? Are you mad?! Instant stiffy!
When I've seen this bel ami photo in the past, it's always been upside down with Lucas at the bottom. Flip it over, and see if it works better for you that way :)
It's kind of bland. I wouldn't frame it and hang it in the foyer. It's bland but in a nice way. Most Belami photos have a blandness to them even though the men are quite hot. Even in their hotness Belami men seem too generic in photos. Their videos are better productions, but still a little stale.
I remember discovering Belami a few years back and being quite turned on, but after seeing a few of their guyz in action they all seem too alike.
I do love Czech guyz, though. And Belami has no trouble finding hot, fit guyz to work with.
This is a square photo. It works in any direction depending on your preference. I think that is 1 of the points in these types of art photos.
Hey, Leduc, you commented on Bruce Weber. Yes, he is an interesting artist. I have not seen all his works, advertising included, but I tend to like his photographic and film works equally. He is artistic in pop-culture ways that I appreciate. He strikes a good balance.
Take care. Mike
Post a Comment